Journalist-cum-spinmeister Edward Lucas whirled through Moldova and Transdniestria for a few days (a while back, actually) and wrote about it in a diary format for his rag, “The Economist”, as if it was happening live over the course of five days this week, from Monday till Friday. That was far from the only misrepresentation, of course.
Lucas specializes in warmed-over Cold War rhetoric, repackaged for today and very heavy on the innuendo. His stock in trade when it comes to Transdniestria is just vile McCarthyism. What is lacking in objective statistics and solid facts is amply compensated in insinuations. Every whiff of allegation, tabloid fantasy, or rant of a depressed hack with a Cold War Cold Turkey withdrawal symptom, becomes unquestionable truth in the writings of Mr Lucas. In the Transdniestria that Edward Lucas created for himself and his readers, the bad guys even have a weapons factory and the good guys love Marmite. But of course.
Hawkish Cold Warriors like Edward Lucas and his best of buddy Vladimir Socor, a propagandist working for a Dick Cheney related neocon outfit, are worried that Transdniestria is cleaning up its act and on its way to internationally recognized independence.
Can’t someone tell them that even if they miss it terribly, the Cold War is actually over. And we won. The Commies lost. So give it a rest already.
But no, they still produce the same-old, same-old, just so they won’t find themselves out of a job. Anything they don’t like is mysterious or sinister, and somehow tied either to a conspiracy or to the KGB, or (their favorite) both: A conspiracy orchestrated by the KGB!
How this is helping relations between Moldova and Transdniestria is anyone’s guess. The truth is that REAL conflict resolution means that all hawks (on both sides) have to be ignored, and the parties that want to solve this thing must rethink their kneejerk antagonism.
If there is give and take, and a willingness to meet each other half way, Moldova will understand that Transdniestria has a right to be independent and Transdniestria will understand that Moldova (and the world at large) has some legitimate worries and concerns that need to be addressed, too.
Meanwhile, haters like Edward Lucas will keep doing the only thing they know how to do. But it won’t help matters any…
[…] In an article published in the April 21 edition of ‘The Economist’, the wandering Edward Lucas writes on an unconfirmed deal over Transdniestria that… “It will be hard for outsiders to block the deal; they may not even bother to try. If they did, they might be called wreckers, given that both sides want it.” […]
Deciphering Transdniestria » Blog Archive » Who are the “sides” to the Dniester conflict?
June 5th, 2007
[…] (no other ex-Soviet republics are mentioned in the original book, although the reviewer from The Economist - no doubt Edward Lucas - tries to make it sound that way). […]
Deciphering Transdniestria » Blog Archive » Miserable in Moldova, the world’s unhappiest country
January 19th, 2008
[…] The son of the head of Romania’s Communist-era state run propaganda bureau, Vladimir Socor is today employed as a propagandist for a Dick Cheney related neocon outfit. He is often quoted as an analyst and commentator and has been known to plant false flag stories which (with a little help from his friends) can make it around the world a couple of times before they fall flat on their face. […]
Deciphering Transdniestria » Blog Archive » Vladimir Socor, official advisor to Moldova’s government
April 13th, 2008
[…] New Cold Warrior Edward Lucas has been a chief apologist for why Kosovo should be allowed independence while Transdniestria should not. His Transdniestria-related articles, like those of his good friend and respected (by Lucas) collaborator Vladimir Socor, hype a fear of all things Russian which is obviously not shared by the Russian-friendly population of Transdniestria. […]
Deciphering Transdniestria » Blog Archive » New low for Edward Lucas
April 26th, 2008